by
EM Forster
236
pages, Penguin
Review
by Pat Black
Not
so very long ago, I was leaping up and down like a maniac at a wedding. It was
a good wedding – everyone was thunderously drunk and having a wonderful time.
One key test when we evaluate weddings: were people dancing? If loads of people
were dancing then it was a good wedding. This is immutable.
Anyway,
I was wearing a kilt – I’m Scottish, and also a bit of a tart – although the do
was taking place in the lion’s den itself… well, in south-west London, at any
rate. It’s quite common to wear the kilt up north at social functions, and I’d
long been threatening to do it since migrating south. There’s a woad-splattered
Celt in me who takes a perverse pleasure in being asked about the kilt, or more
accurately, being challenged on it.
And
so it happened that during the wedding party, New Order’s “World In Motion” was
played. I was already up and running on the dancefloor, and myself and another
lad wearing a kilt decided to play along, for a laugh.
The
significance of this to the civilised planet: “World In Motion” was England’s
official song for the 1990 football World Cup campaign, a reminder of that horrible
few weeks when They Nearly Won It. The song is a memorable rose poking out
through the landfill site that represents most other football-related musical
releases, I would grudgingly admit, madcap genius from an inspired time in
British culture. It was at number one for weeks, even before England threatened
to win the tournament, losing to the Germans as usual in the semi-finals. The
English get rather misty-eyed about this song – a reminder of a better time.
The
chorus features New Order, one or two gurning celebrities of the time, and the
England squad, chanting: “En-ger-land!”
For
any Scotsman, the idea of England winning the World Cup, or even winning a
corner at the World Cup, is death. So of course, my fellow Caledonian
dancefloor partner and I chanted nothing of the sort, substituting “En-ger-land!”
for “Scot-er-land!”
Well,
you know, I say “death”… not really. It doesn’t matter. We weren’t serious
about it. We were hardly going to stomp off the dancefloor in a huff, swearing
blood oaths or anything. It was a giggle.
So
after the music stops, this fellow taps me on the shoulder. He sneered: “But…
you’re wearing a kilt! And you’re singing ‘World In Motion’.”
“Yes,”
I said, “it’s a joke.”
“You’re
singing ‘En-ger-land’! I heard you! Ha ha ha ha!”
“No,
I wasn’t. I was singing ‘Scot-er-land’. And, it’s a joke.”
He
shook his head. “En-ger-land! Ha ha! And you’ve got a kilt on! You do realise
what this song is about?”
“It
was a joke, mate.”
In
some parts of the world, another key test of a good wedding is whether or not
there was a fight, but we shall skip over that.
Finally,
I spit out my point: acting out of place is still a very frown-worthy endeavour
for many people in England. That could refer to a sight such as a Scotsman
doing the highland fling to New Order; or it could be something a bit more
subtle, and much more sinister. A sense of place is not an exclusively English
phenomenon, of course, but you do still encounter it here and there. Writers of
the late Victorian and Edwardian period captured this beautifully.
I
once heard about someone who retired to the south of France (without bothering
to learn the language), complaining about the influx of refugees and
asylum-seekers into that country. EM Forster understood this attitude acutely –
that proper behaviour travels only in
the cool English blood, with savagery and base passions diverted to alien
veins. The notion is illustrated, and subverted, in the best way in A Room With A View.
It’s
a two-parter from the Edwardian era, when the British Isles still had plenty of
clout in world affairs, and modern warfare and Bolsheviks were still to crush
notions of class, place and society. The nation was also slowly shedding the
mantle of Victorian repression, too. European sensibilities (even I’m buying
into that sense of one’s place… what the hell does that even mean?!) were
starting to cross the Channel to England’s green and pleasant land.
Conservativism and buttoned-down social barriers were being challenged by new
attitudes.
Forster’s
heroine is rosy-cheeked ingenue Lucy Honeychurch, taking a tour of Florence
with her horror of a cousin, Charlotte Bartlett. The older Charlotte is a
waspish prig who acts as chaperone to young Lucy, and along the way they meet
several comical characters including Miss Lynch the hopeless novelist and the
father-and-son act of Mr Emerson and his boy George, the latter pair sharing
the Italian pension they are staying in.
“They’re
socialists,” Charlotte hisses.
In
many ways the book’s key scene comes right at the start, when Charlotte
complains the girls didn’t get a room with a view. The Emersons gallantly offer
to swap their rooms with the two ladies.
There
is an embarrassed silence.
Finally,
once an awkward sense of protocol and one’s place
is followed to the letter, Charlotte finally agrees to the swap deal and the
journey continues. Along the way, Lucy and George witness a fatal stabbing in a
town square, close enough to bloodstain the picture postcards the girl has
bought. Swollen with a sense of occasion and of violent passions building up in
even the most chaste breast, Lucy and George share an intimate moment during a
flash of lightning.
And
intimate moments, particularly with people like the Emersons, will not do. Especially when they are also
witnessed by a breathless and conspicuously scandalised Charlotte.
A
hasty retreat is beaten, to Rome, where the Vyses have a place that would take
in Lucy and Charlotte at a pinch. From there, the story moves to England, where
we meet Lucy’s family a number of months later. It turns out that Lucy has
agreed to marry Cecil Vyse, a nice enough chap, but one who “would never wear
another fellow’s cap”, as Lucy’s brother Freddy puts it.
But
fate – and maybe mischief, on the part of the faux-innocent Charlotte, who of
course swears she never told a soul about what happened on the violet-strewn
Italian hills – intervenes to place the Emersons once more into Lucy’s path.
From there, she is forced to confront a rather un-English idea indeed – following
one’s heart, in defiance of all social conventions.
It’s
a brilliant novel, with great comic moments. There’s one particular scene where
George Emerson, Lucy’s young brother Freddy and the Reverend Beebe, the vicar,
decide on a whim to go skinny dipping in a pond. This being an English comedy,
and this being an English vicar, the trio are of course discovered in their
plashy endeavours by a passing troupe of flustered parishioners, including Lucy
and Cecil.
As
it’s a comedy, the story has certain lines that it must travel along. But it
has a very dark heart. The elder Mr Emerson’s impassioned plea to Lucy near the
end of the novel puts a dagger to the throat of convention, spits in the eye of
a sense of entitlement, and punches the idea of turning away from our deepest
desires in order to do the decent thing -
right in the balls.
Forster
could well have written a different ending to this novel, one which might have
had more in keeping with Henry James’s Portrait
of a Lady, and certainly one which would have been in keeping with the
occasionally dark tones he strikes. We know only too well how this story would
have ended, and which suit Lucy would have accepted, in the real world. But A Room With A View stands as an
irreverent masterpiece, and showcases the British class system in the best
light possible – by not taking itself in any way seriously.
No comments:
Post a Comment