500 pages, Titan Books
Review
by Hereward L.M. Proops
I've
previously professed my love for Bram Stoker's genre-defining novel; the novel
that introduced the world to arguably the greatest fictional villain of all
time. “Dracula” is a stunningly good book, so good, in fact, that few vampire
novels have ever come close to it in terms of raw power and innovation. I've
recently read the book for the third time (or is it the fourth? I lose count)
in preparation for the Halloween meeting of my local reading group. Having
finished it, I was thirsty for more vampiric shenanigans and so picked up a
copy of the recently re-released “Anno Dracula” by Kim Newman.
First
published in 1992, Newman's novel is an intriguing alternate history epic that
stems from the notion that Van Helsing and his band of fearless vampire slayers
failed in their attempt to stop the wicked Count from settling in London. In
Newman's world, the Count defeated Van Helsing and his followers, had Van
Helsing's head mounted on a spike, married the widowed Queen and set himself up
as Lord Protector of the British Empire. Under Dracula's diabolical rule, the
plague of vampirism spreads quickly until nearly half the population are “new-born”
bloodsuckers trying to adjust to the strange new world.
Setting
is so important in an alternate history novel and Newman's depiction of a
Victorian London plunging into darkness is staggeringly well-executed. Although
one might expect the vampires to be the villains of the piece, Newman opts to
portray the bloodsuckers in a far less malevolent light. Vampirism is treated
more like a new fashion craze which sweeps the capital. Naturally, there are
tensions between those who embrace being un-dead and those who choose to remain
“warm”. The tensions grow stronger as Dracula appoints more and more of his
vampiric followers in positions of power whilst ruthlessly crushing any
dissenters with his brutal Carpathian Guard.
Fiction
and history are perfectly blended in the narrative. Countless characters from
popular Victorian literature rub shoulders with real historical figures. We've
seen this done before (Alan Moore's “The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen”
springs to mind) but seldom is it achieved with such a deft touch. Newman has
clearly climbed mountains of research but doesn't flaunt his learning or
overwhelm the reader with oblique references. To those in the know, the
historical and fictional characters are liberally scattered throughout the
novel but one's enjoyment of the story won't be affected if you aren't able to
pick up on them all. This is no mean feat but Newman is clearly an accomplished
storyteller, making it seem not just effortless but entirely natural. Where
else can one find Fu Manchu rubbing shoulders with Professor Moriarty or Oscar
Wilde hob-nobbing with a vampiric version of Stoker's own Lord Godalming?
The
main plot concerns itself with un-dead elder vampire Genevieve Dieudonne
teaming up with Charles Beauregard, a spy who works for the Diogenes Club (a
proto-secret service first suggested in one of Conan Doyle's “Sherlock Holmes”
stories and then further expanded upon in novels and stories written by Newman
himself). Genevieve and Charles are in pursuit of Jack the Ripper who, in this
incarnation, is a murderer of vampire prostitutes in Whitechapel. Early on in
the novel, Newman reveals that the Ripper is, in fact, Doctor Jack Seward from
Stoker's original novel, driven hopelessly mad by his previous confrontation
with the Count. Although this revelation might seem a spoiler best saved for
the end of the story, Newman's clever plotting ensures that readers remain
gripped – not because they wish to learn the Ripper's identity but because they
wish to see how he ended up so utterly batshit bonkers. Indeed, what makes this
such an appealing concept is how closely Newman sticks to the character
established by Bram Stoker and how Seward's mental decline occurs as a result
of what Stoker put the character through in his novel. Best of all is the very
respectful way in which Newman handles the character of Dracula. Stoker kept
the vampiric overlord hidden in the shadows for much of the book, an enigmatic
and eerie presence whose malign influence was felt throughout the novel. Newman
pulls off a similar feat; we hear much about Dracula and how his polluted
bloodline is spreading wickedness throughout the country but we don't see him
until the final chapter where Newman treats us to a suitably grotesque,
overblown climax.
Intelligent,
creepy, hilarious and thrilling, “Anno Dracula” pays tribute to the greatest
horror novel ever written whilst creating a wonderfully realised world that is
both strangely familiar and wholly unique. Fans of the vampire fiction or the
Victorian period would be doing themselves a disservice not to check out this
marvellous book, especially considering that the new edition features extensive
notes, an alternative ending, excerpts from the unused screenplay, an essay by
Newman and a stand-alone short story which sees the Count discovering the joy
of motoring. Bloody fangtastic.
Hereward
L.M. Proops
Being a big Dracula fan, I read Anno Dracula, and was quite disappointed.
ReplyDelete