416 pages, Orion
Review
by Pat Black
We
just can’t let the Victorians go. As readers and writers, we use any excuse to
go back to the days of pea soupers, hansom cabs and those incredible whalebone
corsets. In any other sphere of the arts, this kind of obsession with the past
might seem old hat. Think of Oasis trying so hard to be the Beatles.
But
Victoriana – is it a genre to itself? I suspect it is – provides an altogether
different experience. Elijah’s Mermaid touches on the tone and texture of the
great doorstoppers of the late 1800s, while keeping us grounded in reality and
present day concerns.
Essie
Fox’s follow-up to the well-received The Somnambulist paddles in the same pool.
It concerns web-toed Pearl, an orphan found dumped on the banks of the Thames
as an infant who is taken in and brought up in a brothel. Once she hits 14 –
more than old enough for vile pimps and punters to take a shine to her – she is
auctioned off to the highest bidder, who turns out to be a famous artist,
Osborne Black.
Running
in tandem is the story of Elijah and Lily, two orphaned twins whose tragic
backstory is given an even more Dickensian turn when they are taken in by their
kindly grandfather, the children’s writer Augustus Lamb, at Kingsland House.
The house’s name is one of many references to Charles Kingsley’s The Water
Babies, and indeed water is a recurring motif. As the twins grow up in this
idyllic country house setting, Elijah begins to show a talent for the emerging
art of photography. Along with Lily, he visits London, where a chance encounter
with Pearl in a freakshow changes the course of all their lives. When Elijah
disappears after taking up an apprenticeship with Black, things take a more
sinister turn, and Lily investigates.
The
novel is written in a very sensuous style, mainly flitting between Pearl and
Lily’s first person perspectives, with epistolary digressions here and there in
the form of letters, newspaper reports and diary entries from various figures,
including Elijah. It manages to be a full-blooded book bristling with passion, particularly
when it comes to sexuality, while still maintaining the poise and stiff upper
lip of Dickens or Henry James. Like Michel Faber’s The Crimson Petal and the
White, it takes us into a demi-monde of low-lives and high stakes living, as
much as it shines a light on proper, abstemious-seeming Victorian high society.
The
bridge between the two worlds, of course, is hypocrisy, and it’s here that Fox
finds her richest material.
In
Osborne Black, Fox paints a perfect monster – a man in many ways out of his
time, frolicking nude with Pearl in the surf in Italy and keen to disrobe her
for his art. And yet, a jealous, controlling man who would seek to turn her
into “the loony in the attic” – no cliché back in those times. He cannot bear
the idea of his bride, who is more than half his age, making a connection with
any other man. This reaches an awful crescendo when he chances upon the young
Italian boy he has hired as an assistant, painting a nude portrait of Pearl.
The
idea of these great Victorian men, all bristling moustaches, pocket watches and
grave intonations, living a double life and visiting brothels with nary a care
in the world, is well outlined by Fox. It’s a jarring shock for the reader to
be torn away from Pearl and Lily’s heartfelt thoughts – the former passionate
and guileless, the latter dreamy and fanciful – and placed into Elijah’s
journal, encountering bawdy revue shows and sexual encounters that wouldn’t
look out of place in any modern nightclub.
The
imaginative world of the Victorians is a deep quarry. There are many references
left here and there, the main one being Charles Kingsley’s Water Babies. In her
afterword to the book, Essie Fox explains the settings and influences she
brought into play for her novel. Some of this was unexpected, particularly the
preoccupations of Charles Kingsley, who was actually a vicar in his working
life with occasionally toxic opinions.
The
book casts a knowing glance at its characters and subject matter, but the irony
is never overwhelming, the story never undermined. Although tonally different,
and dealing with an alternative world of magic and myth, the book Elijah’s
Mermaid reminded me of the most was Susanna Clarke’s wonderful Jonathan Strange
and Mr Norrell (what’s she up to, anyway? I’d love to see a follow-up to that).
It drinks deep from the wellspring, but adds that little bit of modern spin and
perspective.
It’s
no surprise that we should return to the Victorians so much in our fiction and
movies. The major artworks and fictional heroes of the time are still very much
alive – they’re canon, and more importantly they’re public domain. Sherlock
Holmes, Fagin, Pip, Long John Silver, Little Nell, Mr Hyde… Like the cities they built, the Victorians’
literature is still around and will long outlive us. In Britain in particular,
there are obvious political reasons for wanting to go back in time. That era
reminds Britons of when London was the centre of the civilised world. When the
British Empire sneezed, the rest of the world said “bless you”. Those days are
long gone.
But
the whole world comes back to these characters, stories and settings again and
again; revisiting, rebooting, reinventing, rediscovering. They helped make
publishing. Their dreams are our dreams. As modern readers and writers, the
Victorians made us.
Thank you, Pat. Some really interesting thoughts about our continuing love for the Victorian era.
ReplyDeleteEssie
Hi Essie - my pleasure, terrific book. The Somnambulist is on my list...
DeleteP