by Steven Strogatz
316 pages, Atlantic Books
Review
by Pat Black
Numbers,
as my bank bot will tell you, are not my strong point.
I
can remember being awarded a big round of applause for being the first kid in
class to recite the five times table. I thought I was cock of the walk. But
after that, something happened. I grew bored of sums, fractions and division. Stories,
art and history are just so much more interesting than the plod-plod-plod of
hundreds, tens and units. There was a horrible teacher lurking in there, too –
a supply case, some sort of refugee from the 1950s system of torture/repetition/humiliation,
barking out sums each morning. How to make learning difficult in one easy
sitting. How to instil fear and unease in your charges, and then something
worse: indifference. I learned something in those couple of months, alright. I
was educated. “Black! What’s 253 minus 177? Come on, not fast enough!” Moron. Hot
indeed is the room in hell reserved for sadistic teachers.
I
had a brief fling with algebra and geometry once I went to secondary school –
enough to get me through the first tranche of exams – but I had something of an
academic Waterloo with calculus a bit later.
Now,
while I still sweat slightly when asked to be the banker at Monopoly, or to man
the scoreboard at darts, I have come to appreciate numbers and mathematics.
Maths is everything. And it can be flawlessly beautiful. It enhances our
appreciation of art; think of poetry and music without rhythm, logical beats
and illogical ones. It exists in fine art, in paintings. Look at the brush
strokes; how many of those are sine waves? Plotting, too – there’s an equation out
there that matches the storyline of your book, no matter how complicated. If
you multiply your tiredness after work by your natural inclination to laziness,
and divide it by your motivation, that’s your writer’s block rating. It even
exists in chaos, bad luck, misfortune, the random as well as the ordered.
And
even better, maths is the whole universe. It’s every solid object. It’s every
element, every atom. It’s sound, colour and taste. It’s everything natural and
man-made. It’s the future and the past. It’s time travel and warp speed.
Eventually, it’s god, or whatever kicked the whole thing off with a great big
bang. It even stretches out forever, further than we can see or calculate. That’s
the sort of stuff they should try to tell seven and eight year old kids. Start
off spacey, then dial it down. Fire the imagination – don’t make them stand to
attention and spew joyless, mechanical rote learning, liberally oiled with
contempt.
In
his collected columns for the New York Times, Steven Strogatz takes us through
the whole universe of mathematics from basic counting to infinity. We start
with the reason we use units of ten – use your fingers if you can’t work it out
– but also look at why some ancient societies used to count in blocks of sixty,
the better to tally with the passage of time. We make our way through multiplication
and division, Pythagoras and trigonometry, and then onto the harder stuff.
A
bit like my formal education, my head began to swim a little when we got to
calculus, but Strogatz didn’t become a professor of applied mathematics at
Cornell for nothing. When he talks about how water bends light, and how we map
out this change through numbers and symbols, we realise that the world of
nature understands calculus, even if you don’t.
Similarly,
he uses popular figures to help round off our understanding of complex theories
and proofs. Compound probability might have led the jury to a different
conclusion in the murder trial of OJ Simpson, for example. The defence argued
that there was a very low percentage of people who beat their partners who went
on to actually murder them. Strogatz points out that if this figure was worked
out for the number of people who were beaten by their partners who then ended up murdered, the percentage would
be far higher.
A
more pleasant character, Ernie from Sesame Street, also pops up to help us
understand why we assign values to numbers in the first place, how it helps apply
logic, avoid confusion. Meanwhile, parabolic curves can allow you to whisper
sweet nothings to your honey at Grand Central Station in New York, and you can
start to build a very basic idea of infinity using a tin can and a piece of
string.
It’s
a grand journey, with an excellent guide. Strogatz understands that people have
a basic curiosity that outstrips any system of learning that formalised
education can impose. Witness the public’s ravening thirst for Sir David
Attenborough’s nature documentaries, or more recently Professor Brian Cox’s introduction
to physics and the wonders of the universe. This is the kind of intellectual
need that Strogatz satisfies. There’s a little bit of Alain de Botton, here, in
the philosophical wanderings, and a touch of Johnny Ball, too, in the use of good
humour and whimsy - but never at the expense of his subject. There’s an
extensive notes section at the back of The Joy of X, for people who enjoy their
sums. But if you don’t, that’s alright too. You don’t have to show your working
or write reams of notes - just appreciate the lesson.
Hail
to the good teachers: the kind ones, the inspirational ones. Society would be a
complete joke without them.
OK, I've read umpteen books on Maths because I know it's a beautiful, mysterious subject which permits wordless thinking but they've all defeated me. This one sounds promising so I'll try again.
ReplyDeleteHi Bill - heartily recommended, lovely book.
ReplyDelete