240 pages, Voyager
Review
by Pat Black
You
have to hand it to Isaac Asimov. Did he have his agent at gunpoint? What on
earth, or anywhere else, possessed him to call this book Second Foundation?
What possessed his publishers to agree to the title? It’s actually the third
entry in the sci-fi series, though anyone with a grain of logic would think
it’s the second.
Brief
recap: Psychohistory is the mathematical process whereby the future can be
accurately predicted. Small numbers of humans are difficult to second-guess;
but when they are spread out across the galaxy in the quintillions, far in the
future, then larger patterns are supposedly easier to spot. The original Foundation
was set up by the mathematician Hari Seldon to head off what he saw as being a
Dark Age lasting 30 millennia, nurtured by the corrupt, decadent and
technologically backward Galactic Empire. The Foundation is a group of
scientists who use psychohistory’s fait accompli to head off this Dark Age at
the pass, making sure it is kept to a 1,000-year period only.
We’ve
followed Psychohistory’s genesis through the first two books in the series –
Foundation and Foundation and Empire – and we arrive at the third on something
of a cliffhanger. One thing Hari Seldon failed to predict was the activity of a
mutant known as the Mule who can detect individuals’ emotions, and change them
to suit his own ends. At the end of Foundation and Empire, the Mule quickly
takes control of the Galaxy and smashes the first Foundation. Yet the long-dead
Seldon has planned for the unexpected, too – having set up a secret, Second
Foundation, at the opposite end of the Galaxy. This group is totally hidden
from view and developing along its own secret paths. The Mule knows that this
Second Foundation is the only remaining barrier to his mastery of the Galaxy,
and so in the first part of the book he sets out to find it, and destroy it.
But
it seems that this new Foundation has developed its powers not along
technological lines, as before, but psychological ones, seeking to match the
Mule’s telepathic powers and turn them against him. I was almost sad when this
segment of the story ended – the Mule reminded me of the Joker in The Dark
Knight, the unstoppable force, the insurmountable enemy, easily the series’
most interesting character so far. The Foundation story had become too smug for
my liking by the time he came along, and he helped shake things up a bit.
The
second part of the story is longer but not quite as engaging. It follows the
teenager Arkady Darell, daughter of a famous scientist who is also seeking to
destroy the Second Foundation, smashing its telepathy-blocking technology in
the wake of the Mule. She hitches a ride to the supposed location of the Second
Foundation, only to find it’s not there. There then follows a game of
galaxy-sized hide-and-seek as the girl seeks to find the elusive outpost where
so many others have failed.
There
are double-crosses and surprises galore – sometimes a little too many for their
own good. It gets so that with each fresh revelation, you are braced for the “ah-ha-ha-ha!”
trump card the Foundation has to play.
In
small incerpts, we get to see the shadowy Second Foundation at work, plotting
history through their immense, unending equations. Adepts might only provide a
line of code or more for this map of history – and consider themselves
fortunate. Also striking was the moral question that bothered me about the
first two books. If you know exactly how things are going to turn out, and you
can twist your opponents and contemporaries this way and that armed with this
foreknowledge, then is this a good thing? Of course it isn’t. This book looks
at the Foundation with a more critical eye, not casting them as straight up and
down good guys. It was welcome, given the Foundation’s series of smart-arsed
victories thus far. I kind of wanted the smile taken off their faces.
I
would guess that Asimov is looking to Tolstoy for his theoretical model; it
would seem that right and wrong, success and failure, triumph and tragedy, all
mean absolutely nothing in the face of history. Sometimes it’s simply a current
that carries some people along, and drowns others. I accept the idea that we’re
all history’s victims in a way, but I’m not sure I like it. With this in mind,
I think this is the last time I’ll be checking the Foundation’s sums.
No comments:
Post a Comment